The English word “priest” is
used as a translation of two quite different terms. TheHebrew ‘cohen’( Greek:
‘hiereus’, Latin: ‘sacerdos’) is rendered as “priest” in English. This word
refers to persons set apart as mediators between God and the people. The word ‘priest’
is also a derivation of the Greek ‘presbyter’ (elder), a word used to describe
a member of the council of worthy men who were the leaders of the early
Christian communities. It should be noted that the word ‘hiereus’ ( from which’hierarchy’
is derived) is not applied in the Gospels either to Jesus or the apostles.
Beginnings
The ancient patriarchs had
no priests like their pagan neighbours. The head of the extended family
performed the ritual sacrifices and pronounced blessings on his family. The
mysterious appearance of the non-Israelite Melkisedek was something of a
novelty.
The Tribe of Levi
It is in the Mosaic time
that a special group, the tribe of Levi, is set apart to act as mediators
between the holy one and the profane people. Aaron is the first priest. His
“ordination” is described in Exodus 29. Elements of this ceremony are the
anointing, sprinkling with blood and “filling the hands”, i.e. a
special rite to empower him to offer sacrifice and bless people. Aaron and his
descendants are a tribe set apart. They are not allotted any land because ‘their
portion is the Lord’ (Joshua 18; Ps 16).
Priestly Functions
When Israel gained
nationhood the institutionalized office of priesthood emerged and became more
distinct. Before the centralization of worship in Jerusalem
under Josiyah various sanctuaries were held in esteem by the Israelites (
Shiloh, Bethel,
Nob, Shechem). Priests were the guardians of these holy places. They presided
over the liturgies and seasonal feasts. They ministered to the pilgrims and
visitors who came to worship at the shrine. One important and popular aspect of
the priestly duties was the pronouncement of oracles. People desired to enquire
from the Lord about what decision to take in personal or public matters. The
priest would then consult the Lord on their behalf and advise them which action
to take. The “tools” of this trade were the ‘ephod’ ( a kind of garment) and
the ‘urim and thummim’ ( we do not know what they looked like).
Priests were also
specialists in questions of ritual purity. Hundreds of rules about clean and
unclean determined the life of the ordinary Israelite. The guidance of the
priest was required to advise whether somebody had become ritually defiled and
what kind of ritual cleansing was necessary to regain ritual purity.
Later the Israelite
understanding of holiness extended to moral actions and attitudes. The priests offered
guidance on how the Tora was to be interpreted. Whether the priest actually delivered
sermons on the Law is not always clear. But Esra, ‘the priest and scribe’, was
interpreting and teaching the Tora to the Israelites who had returned from
exile (Nehemiah 8: 9 f). A special purification ceremony seems to have been
performed by priests at the entrance to the sanctuary. Priests were receiving
pilgrims at the gate declaring the conditions of access for those who wanted to
enter the holy precincts. Psalm 24 is most likely part of such a priestly
pronouncement.
In a later period the office
of sacrificing became the prerogative of the priest. Only a priest was allowed
to approach the altar and perform the various ritual sacrifices. At the time of
Jesus even the paschal lamb had to be slaughtered by the temple priest before
it was eaten in the household by the family. Famous is the sacrifice offered by
the high priest on the day of Atonement (Yom Kippur, Lev 16).Once a year the high priest enters the holy of
holies to offer sacrifice to atone for his own sins and for the sins of the
people.
In the letter to the Hebrews
Jesus' act of redemption is seen as fulfilment of the ceremony of atonement as
described in Leviticus 16. Only here the term ‘hiereus’ is applied to Jesus.
Another priestly function is the blessing of the people. As mediators between
God and the people they are authorized to pronounce solemn words of blessing “
in his name” ( cf Numbers 6: 22f ; Psalm 67). The invoking of God's name upon
the people brings ‘shalom’( spiritual and material well being) on the
worshiping community.
The sanctification of the
people was another task given to the priests by the Lord. Not only the priest
is called to be holy. The whole people of Israel is to be “a kingdom of
priests, a holy nation” ( Exodus 19: 6 ; 1. Peter 2: 9). The priests are playing an important role in
leading the people to become worthy members of the household of God the Holy
One, a people set apart, God's personal heritage.
Prophetic Criticism
The sacerdotal mission
required very high standards of personal morality. There were always priests
who failed to conform to the demands of their office. Prophets have frequently
challenged them. But all their criticism never went so far as to question the
existence of the priestly institution. Jeremiah was a priest himself. He stood up
against the temple priests accusing them of abandoning the ideal of holiness
they have been called to follow.
Jesus will later in the same
way confront the Jerusalem
priests quoting the words of Jeremiah (Matthew 21:13; cfJeremiah 7: 11).
Was Jesus a Priest?
In biblical language Jesus
was not a priest( in the sense of ‘cohen’, ‘hiereus’) nor was he an elder (‘ presbyter’).
He was taken to be a lay person. And most likely thought of himself as such though
people called him ‘rabbi’ – ‘teacher’. Jesus did not belong to the privileged
ruling class of priests and elders nor was he a scribe or trained lawyer nor
did he claim to be a prophet, though some people took him to be one. He was a
person that did not fit into any given categories. There is no doubt that he
was critical of the priests who officiated at the temple. But he respected them
and did not question their authority. To the leper he said, “Go and show your
self to the priest” (Mark 1:44). The
priests however deeply resented his criticism. It is very likely that Jesus'
prophetic sign of cleansing the temple may have been the ‘straw that broke the
camel's back’, that made the priests decide to have him executed by the Roman
authorities.
Like the prophets before him
Jesus, though critical, did in no way question the institution of the temple
priesthood. He did not intend to abolish or “replace” them. His intention was
not to create a new sect or religion and reject the existing people of God. It
would be a gross over-simplification to see in the Twelve the priests of the
new people of God whom Jesus ‘ordained’ at the last supper to act on his
behalf. It was Jesus’ continuing desire to gather all IsraelIsrael should accept the core
messages of his proclamation of the Kingdom: humble service. “The Son of Man
has come to serve not to be served” ( Mark 10: 45). together
as one people. In the ceremony of the washing of the feet of his disciples he
expressed his deepest desire that all
After the return of Jesus to
the Father his disciples continued to worship in the temple, they accepted the
authority of the priests and did not see themselves as their replacement. But
they also demanded the freedom to remain disciples of Jesus. “ We must obey God
rather than men” (Acts 5: 29).
The Eucharist was celebrated
in the houses of believers, the presider being the head of the family. Early Christian
communities later adopted the structure of the synagogue. A group of elders (
‘presbyters’) was in charge of the community of believers. That meant that to
be an elder did not necessarily imply that one was a presider at the Eucharist.
Later Development
In the long and painful
process in which the disciples of Jesus dissociated themselves from their Jewish
roots the idea of priesthood underwent a long and complicated development which
cannot be presented in this short space. Especially in the Middle Ages priests
were mainly seen in the light of the OT temple priest. They were given the
title ‘sacerdos’ (= sacrificer), their office was seen in terms of power to
perform sacred rituals. They became clerics, a special caste apart from the
ordinary laity.
The “Reverend Father” became
a person to whom respect and obedience was due. He “said Mass” for the people
while the congregation passively followed. Vatican II has tried to move to the sources of the Bible,
away from the sacerdotal position of power to the ministerial priesthood of
humble service. The priest is a minister servant following in the footsteps of
Jesus, the humble servant. Vatican II has also re-emphasised the common
priesthood of all the baptized as outlined in Exodus 19:6 and 1 Peter 2:9. There should be no conflict between cleric and
lay person. Both aspects of the priesthood are complementary. Both participate
in the priesthood of Jesus, the humble servant. Both are working together to
build up the body of Christ, the one people of God.
Fr Eberhard Fuhge SJ, a pastoral priest, formerly a teacher, is sharing
his knowledge of Scripture with the readers of Mukai-Vukani in a series of
articles. He is parish priest at Kutama Mission.
FISH
THAT DON’T WANT WATER
The mountains of rubbish are growing. Pazarangu Street
which runs past Stoddart Hall, a national monument, is at
one point half covered with stinking refuse making it difficult
for cars and people to pass; now the other lane is beginning
to be covered as well. Our young people were organized into
a cleaning brigade and began, dressed in new T-shirts and
equipped with new shovels, to move the stinking mass, for
some days with the help of City Council trucks.